Students spend hours understanding chords with compound past. [Who is washed?” –> “They.” The subject is therefore the recipient of the appeal, there is consensus.] 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the semi-auxiliary object. Did you see Romain`s new bike? This is it. [“Roman`s new motorcycle” is the direct object; in the first sentence, it does not conform to the verb; in the second sentence, the personal pronoun “the” is the direct object that replaces “Roman`s new motorcycle”; the old “bought” stake therefore agrees with it.] The rules of agreement of past participants are different. The fundamental principles are: Being with as your auxiliary verb, it is quite simple. Current participants will have the same type of agreements as the regular French adjective. But the verbs have to be approved in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb moves forward. Pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb. Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. So to know if current participants need to agree, you need to determine the function of the reflexive prognosis. That`s how it works. So here`s the past compounded with the rule of agreement have: many people want to avoid the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and discuss on Facebook: if there is a direct object that is the recipient of the action, then the rules of agreement are the same as in have: the previous participant agrees with the direct object when placed in front of the verb and disagrees if placed after.
However, if you learn French to communicate in French, all these agreements are silent most of the time! It is only in writing that it counts. In this case, you will always use “Tre” but there will be no agreement: not with the subject, not with the direct object… Of course, if the noun is replaced by an object pronoun, this pronoun is always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no agreement with it.
